I recently had a girlfriend call me up exasperated and annoyed with her successful boyfriend with whom she had been together with for a few years. After a few heated arguments the issue seemed to boil down to: “Well…what is my Vahjayjay worth?” It seems the comment (he is a banker by the way) “You are just not a good investment” slipped off his tongue in the heat of the moment. The thought of posing such a question is not so outrageous. Sex and money make the world go round and the ugly truth occasionally rears its head!
Women look at the numbers when it concerns love and romance as well. This attractive lady’s boyfriend wanted to have sex every day, sometimes twice a day, depending on the “stress level” at the office. Although they maintained separate residences with each individual paying their own bills, taxes, insurance, utilities etc…80% of the time they managed to have sleepover’s at his place. He wants her but is not thrilled about the teenage “baggage” that has to be included a lot of the time. Whoever said “divorced, single with kids” was going to be easy?
This couple has been together in a relationship for two years. Lets do a cost-benefit analysis for one year to understand her emotions. Lets give Mr. High Testosterone an extra three times a week for “stress relief sex” (Women want their men to be happy!) That is 10 times a week at 520 times a year. If the banker were to hire a decent prostitute at $ 300.00 a pop, absent the bonus of emotional fulfillment, it would cost 520 x $300.00 = $156,000 a year. This is a great salary for a woman in a down economy! When a single lady is stressed, paying her own bills, and is sometimes not “up for the challenge” one cannot blame her for considering her investment in the relationship. Yes it is true that romance takes some finance in courtship, dinners, trips here and there, but lets take a look at his numbers. Most women do like to go out for dinner. Lets very generously throw in $1000.00 a week for dinner and entertainment, ( this is a lot for most men) at $52,000 a year. Lets add a few vacations a year at $15,000 which is extremely nice by most standards. This adds up to $67,000.00 a year in courtship dollars. When you do the math of $156,000.00-$67,000.00, there is a surplus of $89,000.00 for the man. In a woman’s mind, she might expect that surplus to take the form of some kind of appreciation. If a man took the time to contemplate the numbers he might be slower to react when his girlfriend whines about needing some new tires or a new air conditioning unit, especially if she is struggling.
“Why buy the cow if you can milk it for a cheap wholesale price” is often how a woman can feel when they are taking care of themselves, their household, expenses, and children while keeping their man warm every night. Dude, be understanding when a woman needs that appreciation sometimes in cash to help out. Research shows that a woman values protection and financial security, ranking it often above physical attraction in their priorities. Especially as women grow older. Each relationship is unique. There are men that do complain about providing well and not having their needs met, which is another story. In the case of a woman feeling like she is at a “volume discount” it might be a wonderful gesture for a man to open his wallet and put a huge smile on her face.




Great story.
The math here is all wrong. The sex is an even exchange – SHE gets the same thing HE does. (don’t ask me to compare the costs of male and female prostitutes; I don’t have the data and I’m not going to look for it)
Love it!
I totally disagree with Stewart! Men and women are different creatures and have different desires. Men have a stronger sexual desire than women usually do. What may please a woman may not be sex but for a man… a man desires sexual pleasure.
I think that there should co-exist a partnership between a man and a woman. However, I do agree with some points in this article.
Woot woot! This makes total sense.
I absolutely do not agree with the article. Stuart IS right–the math does not add up!
First, even assuming $300 per session of hot sex, the author forgets about volume discounts. Sure, a single beer may be $6.00 each at a restaurant, but when you buy them by the case–it sure costs less than $1.00 each.—Wow, the mark-up is over 6-fold here.
Now, let’s take the same discount on the “Vahjayjay”. Hmmmmm…$156,000 per year divided by the same discount of 6 = $26,000 per year!!!
Now that appears to be the way to go for ten hot sessions of sex per week without the emotional baggage. So what have we all learned in our little math lesson???
The lesson is clear: 1. Buy in volume, 2. Take the discount, and 3. Never deal with the baggage. Be careful ladies….do not let other men see this…they may just re-examine their own deal. The average U.S. household makes approximately $50,000 per year. That means a married woman would get approximately half, or $25,000 per year, while the poor average married man probably gets less than 10 mediocre sex sessions per week…..and, oh yeah, definitely NEVER without the additional costs of some bitching, whining or heavy ‘honey-do’ lists.
I guess the old saying is true, “If it flies, f***s, or floats, it is always cheaper to rent!”
David
I think the issue goes a lot deeper. It’s all about courting a woman, which in so many cases seems to have fallen by the wayside in the last 30 years, maybe more. Sure, I’m financially independent and can take care of myself. Does that mean I want to? No! Just because I don’t “need” a man to support me financially, I do “want” a man to treat me like a woman, take me out and pay for it, and do nice things for me. In return I’m happy to cook for him and do things like that, so men, don’t misunderstand and think I’m saying otherwise.
For the most part (there are always exceptions): Men want women for sex and companionship; women want men for security and commitment and often sex, sometimes just not as often as men do. But there’s a price for all of it. If a man isn’t willing to do his part, then it might be time to move on. Likewise, if a woman isn’t doing her part, it might be time for him to move on.
VERY WELL SAID!!!!!
Okay everyone. I am the friend the author is talking about. I came up with the analogy.
Stewart and David are WRONG and like many men, believe in entitlement when it comes to long term relationships. As for David, there are no discounts. It is what it is! When was the last time you found someone to sleep with for less than $300? Even if you found a nice girl–there would be strings attached….Nice girls aren’t in to one night stands.